<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>smallcarsonly.org &#187; EggPusher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smallcarsonly.org/author/eggpusher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smallcarsonly.org</link>
	<description>We love Small 80's Cars, RWD, MPG and cheap!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Small cars get poor marks in collision test</title>
		<link>http://www.smallcarsonly.org/2009/04/small-cars-get-poor-marks-in-collision-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smallcarsonly.org/2009/04/small-cars-get-poor-marks-in-collision-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EggPusher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small Car love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honda fit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart fortwo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toyota yaris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallcarsonly.org/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Small cars get poor marks in collision test So, understandably small cars do not do so well in crash tests when put up against a larger vehicle. Can&#8217;t ignore physics can we? I think it&#8217;s all relative. Put up the C Class Mercedes against a big rig and then tell me how the results stand. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Small cars get poor marks in collision test" href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CRASH_TESTS?SITE=CAGRA&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT" target="_blank">Small cars get poor marks in collision test</a></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img class="alignleft" src="http://d.yimg.com/a/p/ap/20090327/capt.74ea2c6d39524496addf1ecba7d5a7f9.germany_car_show_les109.jpg?x=213&amp;y=130&amp;xc=2&amp;yc=1&amp;wc=408&amp;hc=249&amp;q=85&amp;sig=IUrN.NTCfwefkiOP19udKw--" alt="" width="213" height="130" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>So, understandably small cars do not do so well in crash tests when put up against a larger vehicle. Can&#8217;t ignore physics can we? I think it&#8217;s all relative. Put up the C Class Mercedes against a big rig and then tell me how the results stand. Little guy doesn&#8217;t stand a chance. However, there is always room for improvement.</p>
<p>It would have been nice to see some crash statistics in the article for comparison purposes to give weight to the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smallcarsonly.org/2009/04/small-cars-get-poor-marks-in-collision-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

